August 10, 2004      

 

A MESSAGE FROM THE AUTHORS

The authorsWith offices all over the country or the globe, many companies' leadership teams are geographically scattered as well. Getting the most from a virtual team, and avoiding imbalances of power, requires some careful thought.

By the way, we noticed that The Trusted Leader leadership assessment test has been mentioned recently in the following business blogs: Hal Macomber's Reforming Project Management (June 26), XPlane (July 1), and Fast Company Now (July 2)

-Rob and Anne-

 

The Trusted Leader

Previous Issues:

Organizational Sibling Rivalry

When a Leader is Sick

External Crises Need Internal Alignment

archives

Next month's serving of Dim Sum: Surviving the BIG Mistake

Harvard Business Review case study: Succession and Failure, co-authored by Rob Galford. Available directly from HBR

LEADERSHIP DIM SUM, PART XVI: THE VIRTUAL INNER CIRCLE

An organization has become so large and geographically decentralized that making the leadership group feel “connected” becomes ever more difficult by the day. Different organizational and cultural characteristics are emerging across the boundaries. And it’s too expensive to fly people in from all over the world on a regular basis.

Things to think about: Is a virtual group at the top acceptable? How does one build trust virtually across a management group?

There’s no substitute for face-to-face interactions. But let’s face it, they’re often impractical. Sometimes, a virtual team is your only option. And when that’s the case, the key is ensuring a level playing field, and also making sure that each person in the group has equal “membership” responsibilities (and is held accountable for those responsibilities).

We’ll offer one small but highly effective example of how to level the playing field, which we figured out after some hard experience at Digitas. Sixty or seventy percent of the people at the executive level at Digitas work from the company’s Boston headquarters. But when the company convenes its regular teleconference meeting of that group, with participants from all over the country and the rest of the world, each person is required to attend the conference call from his or her own office. No grouping. No taking the call together. The theory, rooted in reality, is that when the group at headquarters sat together in one room, they inadvertently created an “unfair advantage” through their proximity. They were able to read each other’s body language, pass notes, and the like. They also, inadvertently, sent a “We/they” message to those outside the building.

The individual call-ins are now marginally more expensive than having a group assemble in a conference room “on speakerphone” with a few scattered callers patched in. But the advantage of having everyone on equal footing outweighs the expense.

~ ~ ~

How about you? How has your organization handled a geographically-dispersed senior management team? What worked and didn't work? Let us know.

Please forward this newsletter to your colleagues and friends who are interested in organizational and leadership issues. Your feedback is always welcome at info@thetrustedleader.com


WORKING WITH THE AUTHORS OF THE TRUSTED LEADER

Contact us for information about having us work directly with you and your organization.

The Trusted Leader website

Take The Trusted Leader self-assessment test

 

 

SUBSCRIBE TO TOPICS OF
TRUST AND LEADERSHIP

If you received this newsletter from a colleague or associate and would like your own subscription, sign up below:

 

© 2004 Robert Galford and Anne Seibold Drapeau   All Rights Reserved   Privacy Policy
  www.thetrustedleader.com

Powered by Constant Contact        email newsletter management by Minerva Solutions, Inc.